|
|
Post by Daniel on Apr 30, 2015 11:27:02 GMT -5
Worship at the Altar of Abortion?
By CeCe Heil / 20 hrs. ago
Abortion, simply put, is the murder of an unborn child. This is a barbaric reality that the Left has realized is hard to promote. So what’s their backup plan? They must start framing the argument as “access to reproductive healthcare.” This is a strategy that the ACLJ repeatedly confronts in our pro-life litigation and one embraced wholeheartedly by the pro-abortion crowd, including Hillary Clinton.
In fact, she is so passionate about protecting abortion, that she has boldly stated that it trumps religious freedom. Yes, you heard me correctly. During her recent address at the Women in the World Summit, Mrs. Clinton declared that anyone who believes it is wrong to murder an unborn child must “change” their religious beliefs to conform to hers.
Although she states in that same address that the laws we have passed must be enforced, it is obvious that she is not including the First Amendment. It is also doubtful that she is talking about the 231 laws that have recently been passed by states--laws that protect women and unborn children from the dangers of abortion. In fact, it is unclear just exactly to what laws Mrs. Clinton is referring. The only thing that is clear is that she feels justified in demanding that people change their beliefs to align with hers.
continue reading
aclj.org/pro-life/pro-abortion-strategy-change-your-religious-beliefs-to-worship-at-altar-of-abortion
|
|
|
|
Post by sevenofnine on Apr 30, 2015 12:19:23 GMT -5
Remind me what name of that ancient Vaeil who put innocent babies on the altar back in da day
Daniel welcome to end time news
|
|
|
|
Post by Daniel on Apr 30, 2015 14:05:06 GMT -5
Remind me what name of that ancient Vaeil who put innocent babies on the altar back in da day
Daniel welcome to end time news
Thanks, Kelly.. it's good to see you're right into the action here. |
|
|
|
Post by Daniel on Apr 30, 2015 14:12:51 GMT -5
Hillary Clinton Wants Christians to Give Up on Bible Beliefs
Ron Cantor
4/28/2015
Hillary Clinton is testing the waters. It is one thing to take anti-biblical positions, but to publicly call Americans to forsake the Bible is too much. Giving an address at the Women in the World Summit last week, she made this statement:
Far too many women are denied access to reproductive health care and safe childbirth, and laws don't count for much if they're not enforced. Rights have to exist in practice—not just on paper. Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.
It used to be, you were considered compassionate, caring and humble to embrace the values of the Bible. Now you are the enemy ... according Secretary Clinton and President Obama. It is only going to get worse.
read full article
www.charismanews.com/opinion/49375-hillary-clinton-wants-christians-to-give-up-on-bible-beliefs
|
|
|
|
Post by sevenofnine on Apr 30, 2015 14:53:03 GMT -5
I am sorry call me selfish I not give up my consitatuioal right baby girl you not going win in 2016 people are totally tick off with this admsation
You are lame version of TV show Madame Secretary which sucks now
No problem Daniel I just found out about new FH on FB I am here
|
|
|
|
Post by Daniel on May 14, 2015 10:36:44 GMT -5
Hillary hath spoken: Change your beliefs!
by Phil Elmore
Free media have always presented a problem for liberal Democrats. Despite their love affair both with technology and with the fawning media that has helped keep them in power, it does not take much to earn their ire. The typical Democrat expects, as his or her right as a member of the lib elite, to be served up only softball questions from a sympathetic media. Such Democrats are quite comfortable manipulating both popular culture and the infotainment news cycle to spread, unquestioned and without criticism, their liberal propaganda.
The existence of a single dissenting voice is something the libs cannot abide; the temerity with which a single reporter might dare challenge a liberal for any reason drives them to heights of rage. This is behind every attempt by the left to clamp down on free speech or, more accurately, free speech that does not favor them. It is this urge behind repeated attempts by liberal Democrats to revive the euphemistic censorship of the “fairness doctrine” to silence conservative talk radio. More recently, it is this urge behind the FCC’s power grab to control the Internet and, ultimately, clamp down on speech of which Democrats do not approve.
The thing about Democrats is that they’ve given up any pretense of representing all Americans. In recent years, and particularly since President Obama’s corrupt and racist administration seized control of the White House, the liberals have been more than happy to come right out and tell us that they hate free speech. They hate free thought. They hate the idea of dissent. And if you won’t agree with them, if you won’t bend to their will, if you won’t toe their line, they’ll gladly tell you in just so many words that you’ll either be re-educated or punished. Yet they’ll also very happily demonstrate that they intend to exempt themselves from the rules they would impose on everyone else.
continue reading
www.wnd.com/2015/05/hillary-hath-spoken-change-your-beliefs/
|
|
|
|
Post by sevenofnine on May 14, 2015 11:27:08 GMT -5
OH OKAY Hillary whatever
Whatever
Sorry I can't I am too selfish LA yenta
|
|
|
|
Post by Daniel on Jun 17, 2015 9:03:36 GMT -5
Study Marxism to Understand Hillary
Cliff Kincaid — June 16, 2015
Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush’s speech that launched his presidential campaign on Monday noted that Hillary Clinton’s “progressive agenda” includes the admonition that traditional religious beliefs “have to be changed.” Mrs. Clinton’s entire quote, in talking about opposition to her version of feminism and demands for abortion, was that “…deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”
Bush also said of the Democrats, “They have offered a progressive agenda that includes everything but progress.”
But it’s never been the case that the progressive agenda offers real progress, as ordinary people understand the term. Instead, the “progressives” offer what Professor Paul Kengor calls cultural Marxism. This is the planned disintegration of the traditional family structure that has been the basis of Western civilization. Kengor, author of the new book, Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage, told me in an interview that the progressives are guided by the belief that “new rights are coming all the time and that everything is in a state of evolution.” He added, “There are no absolutes for them.” Hence, the gay rights movement has now morphed into rights for so-called transgenders, as we see in the relentless media propaganda that is designed to convince the public that men can, and perhaps should, become women. Kengor says the next step is for “progress” or “evolution” to a new level that includes such concepts and arrangements as multiple wives, group marriages, sibling marriages, fathers and stepfathers marrying daughters and stepdaughters, and uncles marrying nieces.
continue reading
www.aim.org/aim-column/study-marxism-to-understand-hillary/
|
|
|
|
Post by sw7777 on Jun 17, 2015 18:09:21 GMT -5
Message to Hillary - sticking to Gods word is more important than your views.....
To refresh peoples memories , lets look at the documented USA Communist Parties aims :
Look at point 27
www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35
January 10, 1963
Current Communist Goals
EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Thursday, January 10, 1963
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
|
|
james
Junior Member
Posts: 128 
|
Post by james on Jun 23, 2015 7:04:17 GMT -5
Thanks sw7777 for posting that article. I looked at all 45 points and it truly shocked me to see that most of the points are either well on there way or completed.
Again, either nobody see what's happening or really cares.
Is it just me or does anyone else see that a similar situation is taking place in Christianity?
|
|
|
|
Post by sw7777 on Jun 29, 2015 18:31:03 GMT -5
Jesus said that when he returned, he would find little faith.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Daniel on Jun 29, 2016 9:36:13 GMT -5
Hillary Clinton: Has her faith been influenced by New Age spirituality?
By Mark Ellis
March 21, 2016
She says she is an “old-fashioned” Methodist, but the variegated forms of spirituality practiced during her previous eight years in the White House and beyond, would certainly give pause to the founders of Methodism, John and Charles Wesley.
Venerable Watergate reporter Bob Woodward of the Washington Post was the first to publicly reveal her sensational “conversations” with deceased first lady Eleanor Roosevelt, as described in his book, The Choice.
In late 1994, President Clinton and his wife, Hillary, invited a group of popular self-help authors to Camp David to help them find answers after the Democrats’ devastating loss to the Republicans in the 1994 congressional elections.
continue reading
blog.godreports.com/2016/03/hillary-clinton-has-her-methodism-been-influenced-by-seances-spiritism-and-new-age-spirituality/
|
|
|
|
Post by Daniel on Sept 26, 2016 17:58:57 GMT -5
Hillary's abortion agenda 'right out of Sanger's playbook'
Michael F. Haverluck (OneNewsNow.com)
September 25, 2016
As Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton fine-tunes her campaign platform to appeal to more Americans before the upcoming November election, one high-ranking Republican is saying her scheme make Americans fund abortions “is right out of Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger’s playbook.”
Rep. Keith Rothfus (R-Pa.) points out that the aspiring first woman to lead from the Oval Office is following in the footsteps of another woman who is not only credited with starting the abortion movement a century ago, but with embedding America in extreme forms of racism and communism that plague the nation to this day.
“Sanger was a racist and eugenicist who referred to African-Americans and disabled Americans as ‘morons,’ ‘imbeciles,’ ‘human weeds’ and ‘misfits,’” Rothfus wrote in his column posted on LifeNews. “Sanger admired – and closely studied – Stalinist Russia’s eugenicist policies. She marveled at how the communist state utilized both abortion and religious oppression to advance its societal goals, [and] like her protégé Hillary Clinton, Sanger attacked religious beliefs as an obstacle to abortion and stated: ‘We [in America] could well take example from Russia.’”
Pre-election warning
Reflecting Sanger’s eagerness to push the envelope when it comes to America’s policy on abortion, Clinton is aiming to make sure abortions are not only paid for by every American, but that they are available at every stage of a woman’s pregnancy.
“Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has extreme ambitions for abortion on demand in America,” the Representative impressed. “She wants to make it taxpayer funded and available until the day of birth – and she does not want the First Amendment to get in her way.”
Rothfus reminds Americans who have convictions to protect preborn babies that they do not have to stand aside and endure Clinton’s extreme abortion agenda for the next four years.
more
www.onenewsnow.com/pro-life/2016/09/25/hillarys-abortion-agenda-right-out-of-sangers-playbook
|
|
|
|
Post by Daniel on Oct 18, 2016 7:04:35 GMT -5
Conservative Christians, Be Assured That President Hillary Clinton Will Declare War On You
Michael Brown
Oct 16, 2016
Make no mistake about it. If you are a conservative Christian and Hillary Clinton becomes our next president, she will declare war on certain aspects of your faith. Your religious liberties will be targeted, and your biblical beliefs will be branded disturbing, if not downright dangerous.
Do not be deceived.
She has made herself perfectly clear on this in the recent past, and we deny this is to our own peril.
Writing for the left-leaning Washington Post, Marc Thiessen, former chief speechwriter for George W. Bush, declared that “Hillary Clinton is a threat to religious liberty.”
He began his October 13 column with these two sobering paragraphs:
“In a speech not long before she launched her 2016 presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton made a stunning declaration of war on religious Americans. Speaking to the 2015 Women in the World Summit, Clinton declared that ‘deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.’
“Religious beliefs have to be changed? This is perhaps the most radical statement against religious liberty ever uttered by someone seeking the presidency. It is also deeply revealing. Clinton believes that, as president, it is her job not to respect the views of religious conservatives but to force them to change their beliefs and bend to her radical agenda favoring taxpayer-funded abortion on demand.”
Theissen is not overstating the case, and in light of one recent court case and one pending bill, both in California and both with potential to go to the Supreme Court, the real dangers of a Hillary Clinton presidency can hardly be exaggerated.
Last week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that pro-life pregnancy centers are required to promote abortion, meaning, that if a pregnant woman comes to them not knowing what to do about her pregnancy, along with counseling her about adoption or keeping her own baby, they must also refer her to a local abortion clinic.
Yes, under the California Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act, this is the law, the Ninth Circuit upheld it.
What an absolute outrage, and what an infringement on religious liberties, since these pro-life centers, which are invariably run by conservative Christians, are being forced to violate their sacredly held beliefs.
Hillary Clinton supports legislation like this, and she would absolutely appoint Supreme Court justices who would support this as well.
She has made this abundantly, unequivocally clear for many years, without wavering, and she is the most favored Planned Parenthood candidate in history.
As I wrote previously, if you vote for Hillary Clinton, you will have the blood of the unborn on your hands.
And note also the extreme hypocrisy of this ruling, since abortion clinics are not required to refer their clients to local pro-life pregnancy centers. They are not even required to show the mother an ultrasound of her baby, since that would allegedly infringe on her rights.
God forbid that you remind her that she has a baby in her womb.
continue reading
townhall.com/columnists/michaelbrown/2016/10/16/conservative-christians-be-assured-that-president-hillary-clinton-will-declare-war-on-you-n2232947?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad
|
|
|
|
Post by Daniel on Oct 24, 2016 17:25:24 GMT -5
Hillary Clinton's Insidious Threat to Traditional Christianity
By Tyler O'Neil October 22, 2016
Conservative Christian support for Donald Trump has become something of a scandal of late. But no matter how odious the Republican nominee's faults may be, religious believers must not be fooled — Hillary Clinton represents a terrifying threat to religious freedom and traditional faith in general.
Last April, Clinton infamously declared that "deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs, and structural biases have to be changed" in order to make way for abortion and other forms of "reproductive health care." These remarks, given at the sixth annual Women in the World Summit, are fully in keeping not only with other denigrating speeches she has given about religious beliefs, but even with her colleagues' political work behind the scenes, as recently revealed by WikiLeaks.
For years, Clinton and her associates have demonstrated a contempt for traditional religious beliefs and an insidious effort to change them by whatever means necessary.
One such effort was revealed by WikiLeaks. In an email from February 2012, Sandy Newman, president and founder of the progressive nonprofit Voices for Progress, wrote to John Podesta (now Clinton's campaign chairman) that "there needs to be a Catholic Spring [like the Arab Spring], in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic Church."
Podesta, rather than dismissing the idea of infiltrating a Christian church and trying to force it to reject longstanding doctrine, said he had already attempted to do this. "We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a movement like this. Likewise Catholics United," he replied. The first group Podesta mentioned, Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, is funded by George Soros and pushes left-wing ideologies which are inconsistent with Catholic doctrine.
continue reading
pjmedia.com/faith/2016/10/22/hillary-clintons-insidious-threat-to-traditional-christianity/
|
|
james
Junior Member
Posts: 128
|
Post by james on Oct 24, 2016 18:15:13 GMT -5
The key words, "Traditional Christianity".
|
|
!!
